Legal Consequences of Damage to Seized Evidence Stored at RUPBASAN

ABSTRACT: This study examines the legal regulation of seized evidence stored at Indonesia’s State Seized Property Storage House (RUPBASAN) and the consequences of damage during storage. It uses normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis distinguishes the seizing official’s responsibility from custodial duties under Law Number 20 of 2025 and compatible implementing regulations. Damage may impair evidentiary integrity, reduce economic value, and raise questions of liability and compensation. However, neither evidentiary exclusion nor liability arises automatically. Assessment requires examination of the cause, initial condition, custodial duties, fault, and resulting loss. Documented handovers, risk-based maintenance, and inter-agency coordination are recommended to protect evidence and the rights of entitled parties.

KEYWORDS – Damage, Evidence, Legal Consequences, RUPBASAN, Seizure